Comments on: General Introduction http://www.natures-word.com Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:08:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Aidrian O'Connor http://www.natures-word.com/sacred-geometry/general-introduction/comment-page-1#comment-31 Aidrian O'Connor Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:34:26 +0000 http://natures-word.com/?page_id=13#comment-31 Indeed, and agreed... there are finer points I might disagree with, although my writing style from twelve years ago (when this was written) was a bit more strident than it is these days. Rather than rewrite it or alter it now though, I'd rather let it stand for what it was when originally written. Thanks for the comments. Indeed, and agreed… there are finer points I might disagree with, although my writing style from twelve years ago (when this was written) was a bit more strident than it is these days. Rather than rewrite it or alter it now though, I’d rather let it stand for what it was when originally written.

Thanks for the comments.

]]> By: Cameron O'Connor http://www.natures-word.com/sacred-geometry/general-introduction/comment-page-1#comment-30 Cameron O'Connor Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:28:37 +0000 http://natures-word.com/?page_id=13#comment-30 Minis has some points, Aidrian. Though I don't believe claiming "nature mirrors itself" is a stretch at all. As above... So below. It seems quite obvious to me. Geometry in the end is a human language. A pure language, but language all the same. It represents something unspeakable. That being said... The symbolic manifestations of archetype in human day to day life is important, and trans-formative. Minis has some points, Aidrian. Though I don’t believe claiming “nature mirrors itself” is a stretch at all. As above… So below. It seems quite obvious to me.
Geometry in the end is a human language. A pure language, but language all the same. It represents something unspeakable. That being said… The symbolic manifestations of archetype in human day to day life is important, and trans-formative.

]]> By: Zeric http://www.natures-word.com/sacred-geometry/general-introduction/comment-page-1#comment-29 Zeric Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:54:04 +0000 http://natures-word.com/?page_id=13#comment-29 great information here.... i need to make a project on this topic... bt i dnt hv any idea how to make the cover...any ideas? by the way...this site is GREAT!!! THNX A TON... :) great information here….
i need to make a project on this topic…
bt i dnt hv any idea how to make the cover…any ideas?
by the way…this site is GREAT!!!
THNX A TON… :)

]]> By: Minis http://www.natures-word.com/sacred-geometry/general-introduction/comment-page-1#comment-28 Minis Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:42:31 +0000 http://natures-word.com/?page_id=13#comment-28 Using modern LCD displays there is no need to have black background and white letters. In fact i barely could read this paragraph to the end - my eyes sore. This is just a suggestion for an improvement, not a criticizm. Having read just introduction, i find it interesting, but i would avoid such statements as "... who can deny ..." and " ... as it is believed that sacred geometry is so firmly ingrained within our consciousness (consciousness being a product of nature) that we cannot help but to be attracted to a true mirror of nature such as the artwork represents ..." The first one is challenge to prove opposite statement when statement itself states an existence of something without sufficient prove. The opposite would be a statement of non-existence. It is very difficult if not impossible to prove non-existence, therefore all science tries to prove what "is" istead of what "isn't". The second statement implies attraction to the patterns but as it is written is based mainly on believe. It's difficult to deny that most of the people are attracted to simplicity and beauty of patterns and numbers, however to claim that it's a true mirror of nature would be a stretch. There are, of course, facts that show how simple geometry describe complex figures, however i think that it might be that this simplistic approach describes what human perceives as nature, which is not necessarily "a true mirror of nature" itself. Could one describe nature using platonic solids? Could one draw exact copy of a cloud using the same priciples of simple geometry as for drawing pyramid? Those are just a few questions that pop into my mind read just this part. I will read further and see if any of the questions will be answered. Thanks for putting your findings on the website. Using modern LCD displays there is no need to have black background and white letters. In fact i barely could read this paragraph to the end – my eyes sore. This is just a suggestion for an improvement, not a criticizm. Having read just introduction, i find it interesting, but i would avoid such statements as
“… who can deny …” and ” … as it is believed that sacred geometry is so firmly ingrained within our consciousness (consciousness being a product of nature) that we cannot help but to be attracted to a true mirror of nature such as the artwork represents …”
The first one is challenge to prove opposite statement when statement itself states an existence of something without sufficient prove. The opposite would be a statement of non-existence. It is very difficult if not impossible to prove non-existence, therefore all science tries to prove what “is” istead of what “isn’t”.
The second statement implies attraction to the patterns but as it is written is based mainly on believe. It’s difficult to deny that most of the people are attracted to simplicity and beauty of patterns and numbers, however to claim that it’s a true mirror of nature would be a stretch. There are, of course, facts that show how simple geometry describe complex figures, however i think that it might be that this simplistic approach describes what human perceives as nature, which is not necessarily “a true mirror of nature” itself. Could one describe nature using platonic solids? Could one draw exact copy of a cloud using the same priciples of simple geometry as for drawing pyramid?
Those are just a few questions that pop into my mind read just this part. I will read further and see if any of the questions will be answered.
Thanks for putting your findings on the website.

]]> By: angels tattoos http://www.natures-word.com/sacred-geometry/general-introduction/comment-page-1#comment-17 angels tattoos Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:41:14 +0000 http://natures-word.com/?page_id=13#comment-17 Great information here. Thanks for sharing again! Great information here. Thanks for sharing again!

]]> By: Tattoo Design Shop http://www.natures-word.com/sacred-geometry/general-introduction/comment-page-1#comment-16 Tattoo Design Shop Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:24:29 +0000 http://natures-word.com/?page_id=13#comment-16 I really enjoy your site. Thank you for sharing! I really enjoy your site. Thank you for sharing!

]]> By: JAMES http://www.natures-word.com/sacred-geometry/general-introduction/comment-page-1#comment-15 JAMES Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:14:23 +0000 http://natures-word.com/?page_id=13#comment-15 Nice approach. Thank you for your insight. Nice approach. Thank you for your insight.

]]>